Nvidia's Jensen Huang will deliver CES 2025 opening keynote, RTX 5080 and 5090 reveal expected

midian182

Posts: 10,116   +135
Staff member
Why it matters: It appears that the rumors are true. Nvidia has confirmed that Jensen Huang will deliver the CES opening keynote in January. It will mark the first time that the CEO has appeared at the event since 2019, suggesting something big is in store: the GeForce RTX 5000 series desktop graphics cards.

Nvidia SVP Jeff Fisher has taken over the presenting duties at CES since Huang introduced the RTX 2060 more than five years ago. Fisher has unveiled several products during his time, including the RTX 3060, RTX 4070 Ti, and, most recently, the RTX 4000 Super series.

At 6.30 pm on January 6, the day before CES begins, Huang will deliver a keynote at the event. The announcement of the keynote is an official one from CES rather than from Nvidia, so Team Green has yet to drop any clues about the contents of Huang's presentation.

"We are thrilled to welcome Jensen Huang as a keynote speaker at CES 2025," said Gary Shapiro, CEO, CTA. "Jensen is a true visionary in the tech industry. His insights and innovations improve the world, enhance the economy, and will inspire our CES audience."

Rumors that Nvidia would reveal the RTX 5000-series Blackwell cards at CES have been circulating since July, when prolific leaker kopite7kimi made the prediction.

In keeping with tradition, Nvidia is expected to unveil and launch its two high-end desktop cards first: the RTX 5080 and RTX 5090. There have been plenty of reports about both products' specs, the latest involving the RTX 5080. It's claimed that the card will offer both 16GB and 24GB variants, which is similar to what Nvidia did with the RTX 4080 (12GB and 16GB) before it "unlaunched" the 12GB version and rebranded it as the RTX 4070 Ti. The 5080 is also said to feature 10,752 CUDA cores and have a 400W TDP.

As for the RTX 5090, the flagship will reportedly offer a massive 32GB of GDDR7 VRAM on a 512-bit memory bus and 21,760 CUDA cores. It's also said to consume 600W and feature Ultra-High Bit Rate (UHBR20) DisplayPort 2.1a.

There were rumors that the RTX 5090 might feature two 16-pin power connectors, but it's now believed to use a single 16-pin 12V-2x6 connector – though board partners might release overclocked editions that require two connectors.

We still don't know how much the Blackwell series will cost, of course, but it's probably a good idea to start saving now. Whether Nvidia has learned lessons from the Lovelace criticism remains to be seen, but with AMD confirming it won't be competing with its rival in the high-end segment, Nvidia can charge what it wants, safe in the knowledge that people will pay.

Permalink to story:

 
5000 x80 and x90 series won't be cheaper than 4000 series. There is no competition here.

I don't even think RDNA4 will reach 5070 level.. More like 5060 - 5060 Ti level at most.

Always good with options and glad to see a consumer GPUs with true DP2.1. AMD 7000 series only support UHBR13.5 and will rely on DSC in pretty much all cases anyway, meaning DP 1.4 will deliver the same. Sounded good with DP 2.1 on AMD 7000 series marketing slides tho... Very misleading.
 
There have been plenty of reports about both products' specs, the latest involving the RTX 5080. It's claimed that the card will offer both 16GB and 24GB variants, which is similar to what Nvidia did with the RTX 4080 (12GB and 16GB)
Why even bother with numbers anymore? They should just starting using Taylor Swift songs.
 
You are aware that 4080 sold more than entire Radeon 7000 series right?

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/steam-hardware-survey-amd-rx-7000/
Relative to the cards in the 40 series line up, the 4080s sat on shelves for months and it got to the point where nVidia had to force retailers to buy so many cards in order to receive other cards in their lineup. It walked a line of people who could afford it just bought the 4090 and those that couldn't went with the 4070. It wasn't until they released a pricedrop that they actually started moving units.
 
Last edited:
Relative to the cards in the 40 series line up, the 4080s sat in shelves for months and it got to the point where nVidia had to force retailers to buy so many cards inorder to receive other cards in their lineup. It walked a line of people who could afford it just bought the 4090 and those that couldn't went with the 4070. It wasn't until they released a pricedrop that they actually started moving units.
4080 and 4090 sold almost the same - pretty much same percentage at Steam HW Survey.

4080 never was officially pricedropped. It was replaced by 4080 SUPER with a new 999 MSRP and 4080 went EOL. However they perform pretty much identical and the purpose was a pricedrop, yeah. Because at 1200 dollars, many just bought 4090 instead. I know I did.

They won't repeat this with 5000 series. Meaning 5080 will probably still be 1200 dollars but 5090 will be 2000 dollars.

4090 was just 1599 on release. I only paid 1500 dollars for mine (weekend sale). 300 dollars more, to go from 4080 16GB to 4090 24GB? It was a nobrainer. 300 dollars is nothing.
4090 demand was huge and price eventually went up.

I bet I can sell my 4090 for 1000 dollars even after 5080 and 5090 comes out.
 
4080 and 4090 sold almost the same - pretty much same percentage at Steam HW Survey.

4080 never was officially pricedropped. It was replaced by 4080 SUPER with a new 999 MSRP and 4080 went EOL. However they perform pretty much identical and the purpose was a pricedrop, yeah. Because at 1200 dollars, many just bought 4090 instead. I know I did.

They won't repeat this with 5000 series. Meaning 5080 will probably still be 1200 dollars but 5090 will be 2000 dollars.

4090 was just 1599 on release. I only paid 1500 dollars for mine (weekend sale). 300 dollars more, to go from 4080 16GB to 4090 24GB? It was a nobrainer. 300 dollars is nothing.
4090 demand was huge and price eventually went up.

I bet I can sell my 4090 for 1000 dollars even after 5080 and 5090 comes out.

It was a big deal, the 4080 sucked. The reason it went end of life as fast as it did and the 4080 super got a $200 pricedrop was that the 4080 sucked
 
As for the RTX 5090, the flagship will reportedly offer a massive 32GB of GDDR7 VRAM on a 512-bit memory bus and 21,760 CUDA cores. It's also said to consume 600W and feature Ultra-High Bit Rate (UHBR20) DisplayPort 2.1a.

What is the real life benefit from this? And I mean real life, not virtual digital life?

Some may hold their breath for a thing that will make their flickering a little smoother. But trully:

Will my life have more meaning? Anyone who’s looking forward to this event should ask himself/herself that?
 

It was a big deal, the 4080 sucked. The reason it went end of life as fast as it did and the 4080 super got a $200 pricedrop was that the 4080 sucked
You are bringing scalpers into this? LMAO, who cares if retailers would not allow them to return their cards, that is AMAZING.

4080 did not suck at all, price was just too high maybe, still sold better than entire Radeon 7000 series.

4080 beats 7900XTX in tons of games, including some of the most popular new ones:





And this is in pure raster, when you enable RT or Path Tracing the 4080 destroys 7900XTX just like DLSS beats FSR and DLSS FG beats FSR FG.

DLSS = Far wider adoption (600+ games), dll can easily be replaced to change version, much better visuals than FSR - especially at 1080p and 1440p - meaning less jitter and artifacts (close to none, when implementation is top notch, which it often is)

4080 SUPER performs within 1% of 4080 in 99% of games, the only reason for 4080 SUPER was the price drop. Barely any improvements were made. Was simply not needed.

AMD is looking to improve FSR with AI, because FSR will never get on DLSS level in its current state. This is why Sony decided to build PSSR and not just use FSR. They wanted DLSS-like upscaling and FSR don't deliver this.

And oh, DLAA beats native gameplay every single time. Simply looks way better, sharper, crisper. Best AA method today bar none.

1440p with DLAA looks close to 4K/UHD native.

It still amazes me that some people only look at raster performance and nothing else when they buy a brand new GPU in soon to be 2025. This is why AMD performance lags behind Nvidia in tons of new games coming out now and upscaling is here to stay. DLSS/FSR/XeSS has replaced other AA methods in tons of new games.
 
Last edited:
What is the real life benefit from this? And I mean real life, not virtual digital life?

Some may hold their breath for a thing that will make their flickering a little smoother. But trully:

Will my life have more meaning? Anyone who’s looking forward to this event should ask himself/herself that?
A good bit of this is future proofing. There is talk of "reaching 1000FPS"

On one hand, I don't see this providing any value to my life. On the other, I think it's kinda cool and like seeing new tech.

I'm perfectly happy plugging my computer into my TV and getting 4k120. People swear that they can feel the difference between 120 and 240, but I can't. I think it's more or less pixel transition times. I used a 60hz OLED recently and could swear it was 120hz.

It is my opinion that getting a display with good fundamentals will outperform anything that relies on display tricks through the connector any day of the week. Kinda like how early OLEDs could give you an HDR experience on regular content when compared to an LCD
 
You are bringing scalpers into this? LMAO, who cares if retailers would not allow them to return their cards, that is AMAZING.

4080 did not suck at all, price was just too high maybe, still sold better than entire Radeon 7000 series.

4080 beats 7900XTX in tons of games, including some of the most popular new ones:





And this is in pure raster, when you enable RT or Path Tracing the 4080 destroys 7900XTX just like DLSS beats FSR and DLSS FG beats FSR FG.

DLSS = Far wider adoption (600+ games), dll can easily be replaced to change version, much better visuals than FSR - especially at 1080p and 1440p - meaning less jitter and artifacts (close to none, when implementation is top notch, which it often is)

4080 SUPER performs within 1% of 4080 in 99% of games, the only reason for 4080 SUPER was the price drop. Barely any improvements were made. Was simply not needed.

AMD is looking to improve FSR with AI, because FSR will never get on DLSS level in its current state. This is why Sony decided to build PSSR and not just use FSR. They wanted DLSS-like upscaling and FSR don't deliver this.

And oh, DLAA beats native gameplay every single time. Simply looks way better, sharper, crisper. Best AA method today bar none.

1440p with DLAA looks close to 4K/UHD native.

It still amazes me that some people only look at raster performance and nothing else when they buy a brand new GPU in soon to be 2025. This is why AMD performance lags behind Nvidia in tons of new games coming out now and upscaling is here to stay. DLSS/FSR/XeSS has replaced other AA methods in tons of new games.
I can see you didn't bother to read the article
 
It was highly relevant and why AMD struggles with GPU sales in the first place.

Again - https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/steam-hardware-survey-amd-rx-7000/

That is what you call a disaster.
AMD 7000 series sales sucked, yes. That's not what we are talking about. Keep to the topic or stop replying.

The big issue with the 4080 is that nVidia forced retailers to continue buying them or they wouldn't receive 4090s and other in demand cards. The 4070 and 4090 sold great and even when there was a shortage soon after launch, people still waited for the other cards to come back in stock rather than buy the 4080.

The 4080 ended up being sold with bundles so that retailers could get unsold inventory off their shelves.
 
Last edited:
You are aware that 4080 sold more than entire Radeon 7000 series right?

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/steam-hardware-survey-amd-rx-7000/
According to the Steam survey the 4090 sold more than the 4080 and super while not combined even with 20% cheaper price for the x080 card and almost 20% higher for the 4090 in equity now. Nvidia will be competing with themselves and will be sailing into uncharted waters or is it?
We can extrapolate a lot of information from the Steam survey for objective reasons.

The 4090 stagnated in owners and recently dropped slightly.
4080 super only when prices fell to $949 seen a climb recently.
Sure they can price high to improve margins but it would definitely be at the cost of revenue.
 

Attachments

  • 1000050854.jpg
    1000050854.jpg
    665.9 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
According to the Steam survey the 4090 sold more than the 4080 and super while not combined even with 20% cheaper price for the x080 card and almost 20% higher for the 4090 in equity now. Nvidia will be competing with themselves and will be sailing into uncharted waters or is it?
We can extrapolate a lot of information from the Steam survey for objective reasons.

The 4090 stagnated in owners and recently dropped slightly.
4080 super only when prices fell to $949 seen a climb recently.
Sure they can price high to improve margins but it would definitely be at the cost of revenue.
I would like to remind everyone that this whole argument started because I compared the 4080 to a Taylor Swift song
 
Today, we're introducing the new RTX 5080. 10% faster than the RTX 4090 and 40% more expensive. Also, here's the RTX 5090, over 40% faster than the 5080, at only 2 times the price of the 4090.

Our newest iteration of DLSS 4 & Frame Generation is only possible on the 5000 series, due to advance AI hardware inside them.


The more you buy, the more you save
- Jensen
 
At 1200 USD or more for the 5080 and 2k USD for 5090, which actually translate here in Europe to probably 1300 Euros just for a 5080: HELL NO. I'm using 3080 and I can get by without the bells and whistles on a 2k, 1440p monitor.
This price spiral can grow out of control, but my wallet and my patience are limited.
Should they sell the 5090 for a reasonable 1499 USD and 5080 for 1000 USD, I'm in. If not, I can break new records with the timespan my current GPU will hold on in my system :)))
 
AMD 7000 series sales sucked, yes. That's not what we are talking about. Keep to the topic or stop replying.

The big issue with the 4080 is that nVidia forced retailers to continue buying them or they wouldn't receive 4090s and other in demand cards. The 4070 and 4090 sold great and even when there was a shortage soon after launch, people still waited for the other cards to come back in stock rather than buy the 4080.

The 4080 ended up being sold with bundles so that retailers could get unsold inventory off their shelves.
Not sure what you are talking about LMAO. I work with b2b sales and 4080 sold just as well as 4090.

I even know 2 people using 4080, both bought on release.

You claim 4080 sucked and sold terrible. I say it still managed to outsell entire Radeon 7000 series, so obviously did not really suck. 4080 beats 7900XTX in tons of new games, while using less power and while having much better features and RT performance.
 
Back